Having to get surgery is
a very anxious thing for a person. Their life hangs in the balance of a surgeon
who went through years of training in order to gain the experience required to
save a person’s life. In the New York Times article Going Under the Knife, With Eyes and Ears Wide
Open by Jan Hoffman, keeping the
patient awake is starting to become a more accepted, more appreciated thing
from patients as they are able to view what the doctors are doing inside of
their bodies. Most of these surgeries are occurring for minor surgeries that
help keep the patient more involved with their surgery. They also occur with
patients who need dangerous brain surgery. When these surgeries take place, it
is essential so the doctor is able to successfully perform the surgery with
knowledge that the patient is awake, and alive. Both of these reasons to keep
the patient awake has been beneficial for a successful surgery. Being able to
see the surgery brings comfort to the patient. If the patient was not given
this opportunity, the person may not feel comfortable with going through with
their surgery because they will not be able to know what is going on inside of
their bodies. I believe that it is important for a person to have the option,
because then even if they don't take that opportunity, they would have had all
of their options. In the article, Hoffman states, “Patient satisfaction,
however, tends to be high” (Hoffman). Being able to have a comfortable
patient throughout the entire process is very important for doctors as they
want to have a comfortable relationship with their patient. By being able to
provide them with everything they need, doctors are also able to perform the
surgery without the patient having to go under anesthesia. This requires less
pre-surgery and post-surgery work that the patient has to deal with. The option
to stay awake during surgery has not only provided doctors with a way to be
able to talk to their patients throughout the entire surgery, but provided the
patients with a way to understand everything that was going on inside their
body during the entire surgery.
Sunday, March 26, 2017
Sunday, March 19, 2017
TOW #23 - Impeach Trump Cartoon
In this political cartoon by Steve
Benson on USA Today, there is a man in blue holding a sign in capital letters
that states, “IMPEACH PRESIDENT TRUMP”. On November 8, 2016, the United States
of America voted for their next president of the United States. The election
that terrified many American citizens came down to Hillary Clinton and Donald
Trump. Both of these president-elects had their supporters but they also had
people who were against them becoming president. Many people searched through
the depth of the internet to find evidence for why Hillary Clinton or Donald
Trump should become the next President of the United States. After November 8th
occurred, many were devastated in these results hoping that Donald Trump who
became president of the United States would be impeached. Trump was never given
a chance at presidency before people started to protest against him. These
people who followed Hillary Clinton during her race for presidency, continued
to back her up even after the election occurred. They still showed support of
her ideas and what she was truly trying to fight for during her candidacy.
However, these people need to realize that if they impeach Donald Trump, his
ideas would remain with Pence who is currently the vice president. There would
have to be a way to turn back time for these people to fully receive the
leadership they believed would have been positive for this country.
The
rhetorical devices used in this cartoon are imagery and its appeal to pathos.
The imagery is shown to express the man’s determination to protest Trump’s
impeachment. He is wearing the color blue which demonstrates democracy and
shows the side he took during the 2016 election. The cartoon appeals to pathos
as it makes people feel emotion about the election. Whether they are angry at
this cartoon or can easily connect with it. I believe that this cartoon proved
its purpose as it clearly identifies with people who believed Hillary Clinton
would have been the better president. These people are against Donald Trump’s
ideas and believe he should be impeached because he will not be the president
that the United States needs for the American citizens.
Sunday, March 12, 2017
TOW #22 - Eat, Pray, Love
In the memoir Eat, Pray, Love by Elizabeth Gilbert, Gilbert
shares her story of how she turned her life around after she went through a
very difficult divorce. She faced depression through a period of her life as
she tried to pick life back up. This memoir is about Gilbert’s experiences in
Italy, India and Indonesia where she was able to obtain good food, her
spiritual side, and love. All three of these locations helps Gilbert rehabilitate
her mind as she grows into a stronger person. Elizabeth Gilbert is and American
author best known for this memoir, which has become a New York Times Best Seller.
Elizabeth Gilbert wrote this memoir to share her story with the world about how
she was able to learn how to live and enjoy her life after all of these
positive experiences she had.
The rhetorical devices
used in Elizabeth Gilbert’s memoir are metaphors, and personification. She uses
both of these rhetorical devices in order to enhance her memoir and make her
audience feel they are able to connect with the memoir better. Both of these
rhetorical devices are used throughout her memoir to help her successfully
deliver her story she wants to tell to her audience. One metaphor she uses she
compares emotions to a slave. She describes how one’s thoughts are deeply
influenced by emotions. An example of personification used in Gilbert’s memoir
is when she describes how much she loved the pizza she ate. She questions if
the pizza might actually love her back. She uses this rhetorical device to
effectively describe how she has become much happier than she was previously.
She uses the pizza to describe that there is hope for her life to become
better.
I believe that Elizabeth
Gilbert proved her purpose because she successfully shares her experiences with
the audience and proves how her life changed for the better. Gilbert has proved
that with determination that if one wants to change their life around, they
have the ability to do it.
Sunday, March 5, 2017
TOW #21- Oscar's Mistake
After the Oscar’s occurred, there
was a lot of controversy due to the mess up for which movie won best picture.
This cartoon from the New York Time Syndicate displays all of the confusion
that occurred as the Oscar’s corrected their mistake of announcing La La Land as the winners instead of Moonlight. When La La Land was
announced, the cast and crew who were at the venue at the time were very
excited. They stood up and went on to the stage thrilled that their movie was
being acknowledged for the best award at the Oscars. Unfortunately, the actual
winners of this award was Moonlight, making this the biggest mistake that has
occurred in the Oscars. This mistake reminds me of when Steve Harvey said the
wrong name for Miss America. However, the reactions at the Oscars were very
controlled as they were very calm and the cast and crew of La La Land showed
their excitement for Moonlight. The man in the cartoon is the director of Moonlight
and his face represents all of the people because they were all extremely
confused about what had happened.
The two
rhetorical devices used in this cartoon are imagery and symbolism. They
effectively used imagery to represent the two movies, Moonlight and La La Land.
The two people are drawn as if they were in a relay race and the Oscar trophy
is being passed. The man’s confusion is clearly displayed on his face and the
exaggerated excited face is displayed on the woman’s face who most likely
represents Emma Stone. The symbolism in this cartoon is shown by the moon in
the sky which represents the movie Moonlight. This moon is towering over
everything like it is the most important part of the piece. The woman is
wearing a dress and in the same famous position of Emma Stone’s character in La
La Land. During the Oscar’s, Emma Stone had just won best actress and she is
handing the trophy off to Moonlight for best picture.
I
believe that the author proved their purpose because the author clearly
displays the emotions people were feeling when Moonlight won the Oscar instead
of La La Land. The author effectively shows the audience the reactions of the
people and how the mistake made one movie surprised and one movie excited.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)