In Political Divide
Splits Relationships – and Thanksgiving, Too by Sabrina Tavernise and Katherine Q. Seelye, the presidential
election is conveyed to separate families. People had very strong opinions
about who the next president of the United States should be and has created
tensions between families, especially if they had different opinions about the
election. Many family plans for the holidays were cancelled or even moved to
remove the possibility of family members who voted for either Trump or Hillary
from attending. Thanksgiving is known
for the time family gathers but this year after the election, family members
have been dealing with the repercussions of the election as family
relationships were affected by this political divide. Many democrats refuse to
sit across the table from family members who voted for Trump who believes in
things that they despise. Some relationships, no matter who voted during the
election, are still secure and their relationship was not affected by different
political ideas. Sabrina Tavernise is an American journalist for the New York
Times and Kate Seelye is a Middle East journalist for NPR. The audience is any
person who has experienced changing relationships with their family after the
election. This article was written after the 2016 presidential election after
Donald Trump was elected. The author’s purpose in this article is to inform the
audience how the 2016 presidential election has politically divided the
relationships between family and friends and express that family can continue
to have strong relationships even with different opinions. The rhetorical devices used in this article are
strong diction and cause and effect. The strong diction used in the article
depicts the serious effect the election had on family relationships. Cause and
effect is used in this article to show how the results of Donald Trump winning
this election affected many families across America. I believe the authors achieved
their purpose because after reading, the audience can accept that even if their
elected president won or lost the election, family relationships can still be
strong.
Sunday, November 20, 2016
TOW #10 - Political Divide Splits Relationships – and Thanksgiving, Too
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
IRB Intro Post #2 - Open
For my second non-fiction book, I am going to read Open by Andre Agassi. This
auto-biography was written by Agassi to share his difficult life and how he
overcame life set-backs and hardships. Andre Agassi is an inspirational tennis
player who won several grand slams throughout his career. Even as a little kid,
Agassi despised tennis, he continuously grew annoyed when he had to pick up a
racquet every day of his life. As he grew older, however, he became dedicated
to tennis and strived to become the champion he became when he turned pro at
the young age of sixteen. Agassi proves that hard work and dedication will
create the desired outcome in any person’s life.
Sunday, November 13, 2016
TOW #9 - The Results of the 2016 Presidential Election
In this political cartoon in the New York Times by Moir,
Hillary Clinton is shown to be clearly winning the race against Donald Trump
until she sees the FBI and Russia are helping Trump finish the race to become
the next president. This political cartoon pictures the devastation Clinton
felt when Trump’s presidential election began to take the lead on November 8th,
2016. The road in this political cartoon is extremely rough and represents the
entire conflict that occurred between these two candidates during the election.
Moir is an Australian cartoonist who regularly creates cartoons for New York
Times Syndicate on international events. The audience is for people in America
who believed that Donald Trump was going to lose and show them that he has many
people who are supporting his run for president. The purpose of this political
cartoon was to represent the rapid change of the election and show the audience
that Hillary Clinton was in the lead until Donald Trump rapidly changed the
results of the election with his supporters. The Russian president, who
preferred Trump to become president, and the FBI, who reopened Clinton’s
private e-mails directly before the election, are on the back of this bicycle
to represent how Donald Trump was able to effectively use events that occurred
before the election to successfully become the next president. The rhetorical
devices used in this political cartoon are imagery and juxtaposition to
effectively prove the purpose of this political cartoon. The vivid imagery in
this cartoon represents the two presidential candidates wearing the American
flag, the FBI agent wearing all black, and the Russian flag being worn on the
person on the back of Trump’s bicycle. The juxtaposition in this cartoon is
expressed through Hillary Clinton alone on her bike compared to Donald Trump
who had an enormous amount of help from the FBI and Russia’s support to easily
begin to win the presidential election of 2016. I believe that Moir
successfully achieved his purpose because this image obviously shows how Trump
was able to change the election’s results and win the race to become the next
president of the United States.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
TOW #8 - The Glass Castle
In Jeannette Walls’s memoir, The Glass Castle, Walls adequately shares her life experiences to
her audience. After graduating from Barnard, Walls moves into a new home with her
boyfriend Eric and finally accepts her parents’ decision to live in an
abandoned building. Walls’s parents are satisfied with their lifestyle, and
Walls recognizes they have finally found a home with similar people. Walls’s
sister, stabs her mother after being kicked out of her parents’ home. The
entire family attends the hearing and argues the cause of Maureen’s mental
state. This argument created a further drift between the family relationship.
After a long period of time, Jeannette Walls’s father passes away due to a
heart attack. Their last conversation made Walls realize her father truly loved
her no matter what happened throughout their lives. Five years after her father
dies, she left Eric and married John who encouraged her to reconnect with her
family for thanksgiving. During this dinner, it is evident that the family
still holds anger towards the parents but Jeannette Walls convinces her
siblings to leave their anger behind and focus on a better future. Jeanette Walls
graduated from Barnard in 1984 and worked for the New York magazine and MSNBC.
Walls also uses her life experiences to create credibility. Walls’s audience is
anyone who grew up with a difficult childhood. Walls wants to express to her
audience that there can be better opportunities for people even if it seems
impossible at the time. The rhetorical device used through Walls’s memoir are
juxtaposition and symbolism. The juxtaposition is used when Walls described how
her parents were living in an abandoned building but lived with all of their
belongings compared to Walls’s life in a home filled with all of Eric’s
belongings. The most important symbolism in the memoir is The Glass Castle. It
symbolizes Walls’s ideal house as she grew up in a damaged family. I believe
that Walls effectively achieved her purpose because she is able to prove to her
audience that even living with a difficult childhood, a person can live a successful
life.
Wednesday, November 2, 2016
TOW #7 - “Italian Village Devastated by Sunday’s Earthquake: ‘We’ve Returned to the Stone Age’"'
Castelluccio
Di Norcia, Italy, is a village on the central Italian mountain that was
impacted the most by a horrific earthquake that occurred in Italy on Sunday
October 10, 2016. In Time, Matteo Witt and Carlo Piovana wrote an article, “Italian Village Devastated
by Sunday’s Earthquake: ‘We’ve Returned to the Stone Age’” to inform their
readers about the devastating damages that resulted due to the earthquake. Witt
and Piovana are both writers for the Associated Press. There was an earthquake
in Italy during August of this year that left 300 dead and about 15,000 of the
citizen’s north of Rome being provided with shelter. Thirteen citizens refuse
to leave their homes, most of them farmers, because they do not want to leave
their animals or their livelihood behind. These people believe that leaving
their homes would cause them to “truly have nothing left to come back for”
(Witt and Piovana). The citizens of northern Italy were advised to move into housing
that would be safer such as camper vans or containers, a better protected
house. People have described northern
Italy after the earthquake as returning to the stone age or experiencing the
apocalypse. Due to the destruction caused by the earthquake, it was almost
impossible to get to Castelluccio without a helicopter. Medical supplies such
as water and food were transported to Castelluccio three days after the
earthquake occurred due to the inability to safely arrive to Castelluccio. In
this article Witt and Piovana use exposition and strong diction to express the
terrible effects the earthquake left on northern Italy. The exposition in the
article is to explain the aftermath of the earthquake and show how people and
homes were affected. The strong diction is used to express to the readers how
atrocious the earthquake was in Italy. The author’s purpose in this article is
to inform the readers to completely comprehend the earthquake’s effect in
northern Italy. The readers of this article wanted to become better informed
about the aftermath of the earthquake. I believe that these authors’
successfully accomplished their purpose because they efficiently informed their
readers the effects of the earthquake in northern Italy.
Sunday, October 23, 2016
TOW #6 - Political Cartoon of Trump's Wall
In a political cartoon in The New York Times by Ninan, Donald Trump is building his ideal
wall that he plans on making between the United States of America and Mexico. In
this political cartoon Trump states, “Yes, I want a wall. But not Made in China” (Ninan). Trump, who
believes that America will become a better country without allowing immigrants
into America, wants to create this wall if he successfully becomes president. These
immigrants are presumably creating the danger in America and Trump thinks that
building a wall will help decrease the rate of violence in America. Also, Trump
wants this wall to be built by Americans and not from China even though his
brands are made in China. The rhetorical devices in this political cartoon are
imagery and satire. The vivid imagery in this political cartoon helps the
audience view the Chinese men working hard on the wall as Trump, with a
frustrated expression, complains that the Chinese are building the wall. The
satire in the political cartoon shows the creator’s views on Trumps plan on
building a wall. The author criticizes Trump by giving him an impolite facial
expression and a rude manner towards the Chinese workers. The author shows how
trump’s ideas relate to the Wall of China, by including this wall in the
cartoon, as he wants to keep other countries, such as Mexico, out of America. The
audience of this political cartoon is American citizens. The people who live in
America are facing a difficult election with two presidents that are disliked
by many people in America. The author is trying to persuade the people who
either are for Trump or are undecided, to vote for Hillary Clinton because the
ideas of Trump are very unoriginal and will not help America become a stronger
country. This is also the author’s purpose because the author does not want
Trump to be elected the next president and by creating this political cartoon,
the author is able to express and show what they think of Trump. I think that
the author successfully proved their purpose because with their use of
rhetorical devices, they prove that Trump should not be elected the next
president.
https://www.nytsyn.com/cartoons/cartoons?channel_id=127#1452836
Sunday, October 16, 2016
TOW #5 - China Drops One-Child Policy, but ‘Exhausted’ Tiger Moms Say One is Plenty
The one-child policy, introduced in 1979, began in China to reduce the country’s population. However, over time this harsh policy slowed down and allowed its citizens to have two children instead of only being allowed to have one child. The one-child policy was abandoned in the beginning of 2016 when China’s economy and population began to decrease. In order for China to improve their economic problems, they had to introduce the two-child policy to their citizens. Due to China’s culture and society, many Chinese citizens did not want another child. These citizens wanted to be in control of their own lives and worked hard for their one child to succeed in life. They believed having another child would make their life even more challenging. As many Chinese citizens moved to expensive cities, the birthrate of children continued to reduce. The author’s Simon Denyer, The Washington Post’s bureau chief in China, and Congcong Zhang, writer for The Washington Post, wrote this article “China drops one-child policy, but ‘exhausted’ tiger moms say one is plenty” to share to the world China’s new child policy. “The people born in Mao’s era are growing old, and there will be far fewer people of working age to bear the economic burden” (Denyer and Zhang). The Chinese government needs more people in their country to improve China’s economy and by removing the one-child policy, the Chinese citizens are allowed to have two children instead of only being able to have one child. Even after the one-child policy was recalled, the Chinese citizens failed to have more than one child. These citizens believe they should have the choice of having more than one child and do not want the government to be making these decisions. The authors included the rhetorical devices, diction and tone, to effectively prove the purpose of the article. The author’s serious tone and formal diction provide the audience with the new policy that occurred in China. I believe that the author’s achieved their purpose in writing this article because they successfully provide information to the world about the new policy that was created in China.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

